Cases 71 - 80 of 6,349
Hinton v. Randolph County Missouri et al
as 2:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Carady Hinton
Defendant:
Randolph County Missouri, Randolph County Missouri Sheriff's Office, Eldon Grissom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Taylor v. North County Police Cooperative et al
as 4:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Demario Taylor
Defendant:
North County Police Cooperative, City of Dellwood, City of Pine Lawn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hinton v. Randolph County Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Carady Hinton
Defendant:
Randolph County Missouri, Randolph County Missouri Sheriff's Office, Eldon Grissom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Trajectory Holdings, LLC v. City of Pagedale et al
as 4:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Trajectory Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
City of Pagedale and Gloria Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tapley v. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Derek Tapley
Defendant:
William Jones, Robert Embly and City of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tapley v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Derek Tapley
Defendant:
William Jones, Robert Embly and City of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hegwood v. International Paper Company
as 4:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Antonio Hegwood
Defendant:
International Paper Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
