Cases 81 - 90 of 205
ARRINGTON et al v. MCRAE et al
as 2:2014cv00885
Plaintiff:
ANDREW J. ARRINGTON, SR. and DIANE I. ARRINGTON
Defendant:
ERNESTINE MCRAE, ALEXANDER MCRAE, KENNETH MCRAE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHERMAN v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2014cv01616
Plaintiff:
HEATH SHERMAN
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE , NFL PROPERTIES LLC , RIDDELL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ARCADIAN HEALTH PLAN, INC. et al v. PFIZER, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv00877
Plaintiff:
ARCADIAN HEALTH PLAN, INC. , ARCADIAN HEALTH PLAN OF GEORGIA, INC. , ARCADIAN HEALTH PLAN OF LOUISIANA, INC. and others
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
WRIGHT v. SAUERS et al
as 1:2014cv00021
Plaintiff:
JAMES OSCAR WRIGHT
Defendant:
DEBRA SAUERS, MICHEAL OVERMYER, ERIC TICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chen v. Zickefoose et al
as 4:2014cv00098
Petitioner:
John E. Chen
Respondent:
Donna Zickefoose, Heath and Jenlah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ADAMS et al v. THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2014cv00021
Plaintiff:
TITUS ADAMS , CARLENCE MITCHELL , BRANDON HAMPTON and others
Defendant:
THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Houston v. Thomas et al
as 4:2013cv03063
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Houston
Defendant:
Jeff Thomas, Wilson, P Fredrickson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEATH v. DOGUN et al
as 1:2013cv00355
Plaintiff:
JORDAN HEATH
Defendant:
EYETA JOHN DOGUN, NANCY A. GIROUX, ULLIE KLEMM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNEY v. ABERTS et al
as 5:2013cv07236
Plaintiff:
JERMEY HEATH BARNEY
Defendant:
WILLIAM ABERTS and JOHN MALDONADO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HEATH v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv06273
Plaintiff:
WAYNE HEATH
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
