Cases 81 - 90 of 250
Dizzley v. Hixson et al
as 2:2020cv00991
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Appeals, Judge William H Seals, Ronald Hazzard and others
Plaintiff:
Terron Gerhard Dizzley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FedNat Insurance Company v. Stimatze et al
as 4:2019cv02301
Defendant:
Roy F Claus, Bailey Stimatze and Sharon Hale Claus
Plaintiff:
FedNat Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Thomas v. Bailey et al
as 8:2019cv02262
Defendant:
Assoc Warden Bailey, Officer Butcher, Officer Cummings and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Ira Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Bodiford et al
as 5:2019cv02208
Plaintiff:
Shad William Adams
Defendant:
Mr Bodiford, Mr Scheinsthul and Sgt Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2019cv02076
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Warden Edsel T Taylor, Diane Hingle and others
Plaintiff:
William Tyrone Davis and William T Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duffy v. Ukpeagvik Inupiat Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv02059
Plaintiff:
Yvette Duffy
Defendant:
Bailey Maurice Barnard and Ukpeagvik Inupiat Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bailey v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv01998
Plaintiff:
William L Bailey, III
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bailey v. Mackelburg
as 8:2019cv01809
Respondent:
Warden W E Mackelburg
Petitioner:
Kamau Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bailey v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 0:2019cv01348
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Plaintiff:
Linda Bailey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
