Cases 81 - 90 of 1,764
BOGAN et al v. ONEWALL COMMUNITIES LLC et al
as 2:2023cv20454
Plaintiff:
RENITA BOGAN, SHELLEYANNE LEMON, WENDY CASTILLO and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
KATRINA QUICK
Defendant:
ONEWALL COMMUNITIES LLC, 75 PROSPECT HOLDINGS LLC, PLATINUM MANAGEMENT LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re: Sanchez
as 23-6137
Petitioner:
ANTHONY CASTILLO SANCHEZ
Respondent:
CHRISTE QUICK, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Wood v. Quick
as 23-6134
Petitioner:
TREMANE WOOD
Respondent:
CHRISTE QUICK, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Sanchez v. Quick
as 23-6132
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY CASTILLO SANCHEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTE QUICK, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
In re: Wood
as 23-6129
Petitioner:
TREMANE WOOD
Respondent:
CHRISTE QUICK, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
673753 Ontario Ltd v. Quick Trucking LLC
as 3:2023cv02042
Plaintiff:
673753 Ontario LTD. d/b/a TRAFFIX, n/k/a TRAFFIX Group Inc. and 673753 Ontario Ltd n/k/a Traffix Group Inc doing business as Traffix
Defendant:
QUICK TRUCKING LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Quick v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08439
Plaintiff:
Vanessa D. Quick
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., AFAM Concept, Inc. doing business as JF Labs, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
QUICK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH QUICK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AERO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
QUICK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
DAVID QUICK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sanchez v. Quick
as 23-6123
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY CASTILLO SANCHEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTE QUICK, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
