Cases 81 - 90 of 2,243
Childs v. Lamar et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00999
Plaintiff:
Yancey A. Childs
Defendant:
David Lamar and Steven T Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chatman v. Matthew et al
as 2:2023cv00971
Plaintiff:
Stanley Brent Chatman
Defendant:
T Matthew, R Brewter and R Richerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Kilby Correctional Facility et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00436
Plaintiff:
Deontae L. Hudson
Defendant:
Kilby, T. Rudolph, L. Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00928
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jackson v. Lamar et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00432
Plaintiff:
Dexter Jackson
Defendant:
David Lamar and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Melendez v. McClain et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2023cv00426
Plaintiff:
Timothy Melendez
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heard v. McClain et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2023cv00418
Plaintiff:
Corey Bernard Heard
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. The Keg and Jug, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00416
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
The Keg and Jug, Inc. doing business as The Front Porch and Julian T. Marsh, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Hubbard v. T-Mobile
as 2:2023cv00883
Plaintiff:
Briona Hubbard
Defendant:
T-Mobile
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
