Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 81 - 90 of 177
Rogers v. Holloway et al
as 3:2016cv00064
Plaintiff: Danny E Rogers
Defendant: James M. Holloway, Stanley Dickerson, Scott Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Tennessee Department of Corrections We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00194
Petitioner: Michael C. King
Respondent: James Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Holloway
as 2:2016cv02080
Petitioner: Anthony Williams
Respondent: James M. Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Phillip v. Dozier et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv02072
Plaintiff: Charles Phillip
Defendant: Steve Dozier , Kyle Anderson, Bill Haslam and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mayers v. Tennessee Department of Corrections, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00071
Plaintiff: Richard A. Mayers
Defendant: Tennessee Department of Corrections, et al., Joey Boyd, Russ Winkler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hubbard v. Holloway
as 2:2015cv02751
Petitioner: Darnell Hubbard
Respondent: James M. Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Matthews v. Lee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv02735
Plaintiff: Deonta Matthews
Defendant: f/n/u Lee, (f/n/u) Scott and James M. Holloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. Lee et al
as 3:2015cv01177
Plaintiff: Deonta Matthews
Defendant: f/n/u Lee, f/n/u Scott and f/n/u Holloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Holloway et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv02716
Plaintiff: Steven Murphy
Defendant: James M. Holloway, Buchannan, Stanley Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hubbard v. Holloway
as 3:2015cv01140
Petitioner: Darnell Hubbard
Respondent: James M. Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?