Cases 81 - 90 of 115
Archdiocese of St. Louis et al v. Kathleen Sebelius et al.
as 4:2013cv02300
Plaintiff:
Archdiocese of St. Louis and Catholic Charities of St. Louis
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius, Thomas E. Perez, Jacob J. Lew and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Perez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv02050
Plaintiff:
Rene Perez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Randy Reed Automotive, Inc. et al v. Sebelius et al
as 5:2013cv06117
Plaintiff:
Randy Reed Automotive, Inc. , Randy Reed Buick-GMC, Inc. , Randy Reed Nissan, LLC and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius, Thomas E Perez, Jacob J. Lew and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davidson et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2013cv01765
Plaintiff:
Angela Davidson , Phyllis Kidder , Ann Clark and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amado Perez et al v. Merck and Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv01620
Plaintiff:
Amado Perez , Adelita Perez and The Estate of Gabriela Amanda Perez
Defendant:
Merck and Company Inc , Akzo Nobel NV, Organon USA Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Perez-Arocho v. Sanders
as 6:2013cv03219
Plaintiff:
Norberto Perez-Arocho
Defendant:
Linda Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Perez v. Colvin
as 4:2013cv00860
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Perez
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Perez-Navarro v. USA
as 4:2013cv00446
Respondent:
USA
Movant:
Alejandro Perez-Navarro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Perez-Arocho v. Sanders
as 6:2013cv03171
Petitioner:
Norberto Perez-Arocho
Respondent:
Linda Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez-Arocho v. Hill et al
as 6:2013cv03117
Plaintiff:
Norberto Perez-Arocho
Defendant:
Hill and Thrower
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
