Cases 81 - 90 of 435
Alexander v. Clark
as 3:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Joshua David Alexander
Defendant:
Harold Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Clark
as 7:2022cv00198
Plaintiff:
Joshua David Alexander
Defendant:
Harold Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Bowers et al
as 2:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
Eric Smith
Defendant:
Earnest Bowers, Alexander Lee and Marissa Dickens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cameron v. Newberry et al
as 1:2022cv00329
Plaintiff:
Alexander Cameron
Defendant:
W. Newberry, J. Burrell and J. Gormus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Aluira et al v. W.G./Welch Mechanical Contractors, LLC
as 1:2022cv00274
Plaintiff:
Jose L Aluira, Ricardo Calderon, Manuel Carllo and others
Defendant:
W.G./Welch Mechanical Contractors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Myers et al v. Steam Pro et al
as 2:2022cv00119
Counter Defendant:
Tarik Myers and 7 Cities Fire Prevention, LLC.
Plaintiff:
Tremayne Alexander
Defendant:
Steam Pro, Mike Hampton, Steam Pro Va. LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Andre Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Snow v. Papile, et al.
as 3:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Snow
Defendant:
Christopher Papile and Alexander Michev
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rainey v. Raymond
as 3:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
George E. Rainey
Defendant:
Alexander Raymond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Joseph v. Moore
as 7:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Gary Pierre Joseph
Defendant:
Alexander S. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
