Cases 81 - 90 of 317
Casey et al v. Baker et al
as 1:2020cv10916
Plaintiff:
Edward M. Augustus, Jr., Kristopher Casey and Adams Square Baptist Church
Defendant:
Charles D. Baker and Steven M. Sargent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casey et al v. Baker et al
as 4:2020cv10916
Defendant:
Edward M. Augustus, Jr., Charles D. Baker and Steven M. Sargent
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Casey and Adams Square Baptist Church
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Spaulding
as 1:2020cv10786
Petitioner:
David M. Adams
Respondent:
Warden Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hollins v. West Springfield et al
as 3:2020cv10628
Defendant:
Ronald Campurciani, Joseph Casey, The City of West Springfield and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Hollins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC v. Adams
as 1:2020cv10385
Respondent:
Mark A Adams, Sr.
Petitioner:
Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Koford et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 1:2019cv12604
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Plaintiff:
Amy Sue Koford and Adam Dell Koford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Sherman et al
as 3:2019cv30167
Plaintiff:
Ronald J. Thomas
Defendant:
NICHOLAS J. KAISER, DAVID R. SHERMAN, Benjamin Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barth v. Buckley et al
as 1:2019cv12152
Defendant:
Jason Panos, Adam Buckley, City of Peabody and others
Plaintiff:
John S. Barth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hall et al v. Capeless et al
as 3:2019cv30138
Defendant:
Rose Dawson, Erin Goffney, Joseph A Pieropan and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Hall and EME
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Vapor Technology Association et al v. Baker et al
as 1:2019cv12048
Plaintiff:
Adam Webster, Rising Sun Vapors LLC, Vapor Technology Association and others
Defendant:
Governor Charlie Baker and Commissioner of DPH Monica Bharel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
