Cases 81 - 90 of 367
Phoenix v. Day One et al
as 1:2020cv00152
Defendant:
Day One, James Cryan, Timothy McGann and others
Plaintiff:
Simone E Phoenix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for Harborview Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-1, Mortgage Loan Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-1 v. Rodrigues, Jr. et al
as 1:2020cv00137
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island, City of Warwick, Asset Acceptance, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. City of Pawtucket et al
as 1:2020cv00127
Defendant:
City of Pawtucket, Oswald Street Partners, a RIGP and Casey Realty,a RIGP
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Depina v. City of Providence
as 1:2020cv00009
Defendant:
City of Providence
Plaintiff:
Matthew Depina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
U.S. Bank National Association v. Campbell
as 1:2019cv00674
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
Michael T. Campbell and City of Warwick Building Department, Division of Property Maintenance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amesbury v. City of Pawtucket et al
as 1:2019cv00651
Defendant:
City of Pawtucket, Michael Polaceck, Melissa C. and others
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Amesbury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gautier, et. al. v. Bruno et al
as 1:2019cv00590
Defendant:
Jaclyn Casaceli, City of Cranston, Jaime Cahill and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Gautier and Linda M. Gautier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santiago et al. v. Sheridan, et al.
as 1:2019cv00591
Defendant:
Matthew Sheridan and City of Providence
Plaintiff:
Abel Sanchez and Nelson Santiago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00582
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
