Cases 81 - 90 of 137
Chavis v. City of Phila, et al
as 11-4233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CLERK OF COURT FOR CITY OF PHILA, COLEMAN and others
DENT v. PHILA. PA. PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2011cv07156
Plaintiff:
DAMON DENT
Defendant:
PHILA. PA. PRISON SYSTEM, CITY OF PHILA., LOUIS G. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavis v. City of Phila, et al
as 11-4076
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DA PHILADELPHIA, DEFENDERS ASSOC OF PHILA and others
PRATER et al v. PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2011cv06962
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE PRATER and (MINOR CHILD) PRATER
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY, TAXI AND LEMO, OLD CITY CAB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SAMUELS v. CITY OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2011cv05420
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN SAMUELS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA., GIORLA, DEP. COM. JANE/JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STACKHOUSE et al v. SNELL et al
as 2:2011cv04813
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN J. STACKHOUSE and SHARON A. MINNICK
Defendant:
MALIK SNELL, CITY OF PHILA LAW OFFICES, FATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koran Cain v. City of Phila Police Dept, et al
as 11-2961
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KORAN CAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILA POLICE DEPT, LECIA, #9875 and YOUNG, #7442
CHAVIS v. CITY OF PHILA et al
as 2:2011cv04556
Plaintiff:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA, D.A. OF PHILA., DEFENDERS ASSOC. OF PHILA. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALL v. CITY OF PHILA et al
as 2:2011cv04170
Plaintiff:
JOHN HALL
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA, DELANEY, LAWTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv04022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
