Cases 81 - 90 of 236
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00663
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00627
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00626
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00611
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The Bank of New York Mellon v. Mercedes et al
as 1:2018cv00570
Defendant:
Adelaida D. Mercedes, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, Rhode Island Housing and Mortgage Finance Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
The Bank of New York Mellon f/k/a The Bank of New York as Trustee for the Benefit of the Certificateholders of the CWABS Inc., Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2004-2 and The Bank of New York Mellon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00548
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Fajardo v. Sheridan, et al
as 1:2018cv00523
Defendant:
Matthew Sheridan and City of Providence
Plaintiff:
Esmelin Fajardo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
City of Providence Employees Retirement System v. The Allstate Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv06126
Defendant:
Thomas J. Wilson, Matthew E. Winter and The Allstate Corporation
Plaintiff:
City of Providence Employees Retirement System
Kurland v. City of Providence, et al
as 1:2018cv00440
Defendant:
Steven M. Pare, Ralph Abenante, City of Providence and others
Plaintiff:
Shannah M. Kurland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
