Cases 81 - 90 of 154
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv04693
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Searcy v. Dallas Police Department
as 3:2012cv03891
Plaintiff:
Charles R Searcy
Defendant:
Dallas Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bonneville v. Basse et al
as 2:2012cv00200
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Scott Bonneville
Defendant:
David Basse, Kelle Wallace and Charles R McDuffie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Bailey et al
as 4:2012cv02520
Plaintiff:
Charles R Adams
Defendant:
Bailey, W Johnston and Waltson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heslep v. Thaler et al
as 6:2012cv00206
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Matthew Mark Heslep
Respondent:
Charles R. McDuffie and Director Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00618
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Pickering et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2011cv00718
Plaintiff:
William S Pickering and Charles R Moore
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Miller et al v. Global Industries, Ltd. et al
as 4:2011cv03625
Defendant:
Global Industries, Ltd. , John A Clerico, III , Edgar G Hotard and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Miller , Charles Miller IRA and Ruthellen Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Segovia v. Casillas et al
as 2:2011cv00237
Plaintiff:
Henry Segovia
Defendant:
Joe A Casillas, Charles R McDuffie, TDCJ Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Compass Bank v. Burnell et al
as 1:2011cv00186
Plaintiff:
Compass Bank
Defendant:
Charles R Burnell, Ruf-N-Redy, Inc., Bligh, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
