Cases 81 - 90 of 172
Appomattox River Water Authority et al v. General Chemical Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv00191
Plaintiff:
Appomattox River Water Authority , County of Chesterfield , County Of Henrico and others
Defendant:
General Chemical Corporation, General Chemical Performance Products, LLC, General Chemical LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Winston v. Sessions et al
as 2:2017cv00509
Plaintiff:
LeAnthony T. Winston
Defendant:
Jeff Sessions and City of Norfolk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
The City of Norfolk, Virginia et al v. Safe Boats International, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00159
Plaintiff:
The City of Norfolk, Virginia and Richard J. Hryniewich
Defendant:
Safe Boats International, LLC and Willard Marine, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Scott et al v. Williams et al
as 2:2017cv00120
Plaintiff:
Contina Scott and Warren Lawyer
Defendant:
Maurice Williams and City of Norfolk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Bridget Toole v. City of Norfolk Police Dept.
as 17-1271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIDGET AMELIA TOOLE, a/k/a Bridget A. Toole
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT
Pridemore v. Hryniewich et al
as 2:2017cv00110
Plaintiff:
Timothy B. Pridemore
Defendant:
Richard J. Hryniewich and The City of Norfolk, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 0901
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
