Cases 81 - 90 of 194
Van Fossen v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2019cv00445
Plaintiff:
John Van Fossen
Defendant:
Jennifer Murphy and City of Tulsa, Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Sultzer et al
as 4:2019cv00414
Defendant:
S Sultzer, Tulsa Police Department, Rashonda Basham and others
Plaintiff:
Edd Tawon Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boulac v. SMG et al
as 4:2019cv00197
Plaintiff:
Deborah Boulac
Defendant:
SMG, City of Tulsa, SMG Holdings I, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wade v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2019cv00158
Defendant:
Internal Affairs, Chuck Jordan, G T Bynum and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gene Wade, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Hicks et al
as 4:2019cv00149
Defendant:
Richard J Letourneau, City of Tulsa, Clayton H Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Wade v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2019cv00120
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gene Wade, Jr
Defendant:
Don Deramus and City of Tulsa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Reid, et al
as 19-5017
Defendant / Appellee:
G. T. BYNUM, individually and official capacity, Mayor of City of Tulsa, OKLAHOMA SECRETARY OF STATE, Office of, STANLEY GLANTZ and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SILAS WILSON, JR.
Morris v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2019cv00073
Defendant:
Kurt Dodd, Joshua E Dupler, Anthony First and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Talbot Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2019cv00069
Defendant:
Angela Emberton, E Rangel, Will Mortenson and others
Plaintiff:
Ira Lee Wilkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2019cv00052
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, County Commissioners for Osage County, City of Tulsa and others
Plaintiff:
Yantis Cornelius Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
