Cases 81 - 90 of 394
Laibhen v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2014cv02055
Petitioner:
Clifford Laibhen
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons , Baltazar and Harrel Watts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TAYLOR v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv04256
Plaintiff:
JAMES TAYLOR
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CLIFFORD GILLIAM and SHAWN WITHERSPOON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBERTS et al v. CLIFFORD
as 2:2014cv03029
Plaintiff:
MEGHAN ROBERTS and BRYAN ROBERTS
Defendant:
GERALD CLIFFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHEEK et al v. ALIA et al
as 5:2014cv02580
Plaintiff:
CHARLENE CHEEK , ANGEL CORUJO , CLIFFORD GREEN and others
Defendant:
DREW ALIA, THE FORECLOSURE LAW CENTER, P.C., THE LAW OFFICES OF DREW ALIA, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Bartlett v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2014cv00845
Petitioner:
William Clifford Bartlett
Respondent:
John Kerestes and John Corbett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SIMON et al v. CLARK et al
as 2:2014cv00559
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD SIMON and STEPHANIE SIMON
Defendant:
DANIEL CLARK , RALPH VARRATO , GILPIN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. LOWER MERION TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2014cv02241
Plaintiff:
HEATHER WRIGHT
Defendant:
LOWER MERION TOWNSHIP , SHAWN CLIFFORD , CARL HARPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fake v. Pitkins et al
as 3:2014cv00700
Petitioner:
Clifford E Fake
Respondent:
David W. Pitkins, PA State Attorney General and Lebanon County District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LANPHIER et al v. PFIZER, INC.
as 2:2014cv02069
Plaintiff:
RAMPHEUNG LANPHIER and CLIFFORD LANPHIER
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KAROLSKI v. ALIQUIPPA POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 2:2014cv00452
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD J. KAROLSKI
Defendant:
ALIQUIPPA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
