Cases 81 - 90 of 107
ALEXANDER et al v. SVC MANUFACTURING, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv01636
Plaintiff:
SHA'RON ALEXANDER, ROBERT BENTLEY, MICAH BRADLEY and others
Defendant:
PEPSICO, STOKELY VAN-CAMP, INC. and SVC MANUFACTURING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cobb v. Hammond City of et al
as 2:2012cv00181
Plaintiff:
Barbara Cobb
Defendant:
Hammond City of , Hammond City of Police Department The and Officer D Sangkaratana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COBB v. STRATEGIC RESOURCES, INC.
as 1:2012cv00080
Plaintiff:
SEAN S COBB
Defendant:
STRATEGIC RESOURCES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Cobb v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2012cv00003
Plaintiff:
Thomas Cobb, III
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Becton et al v. Zimmer et al
as 3:2011cv00502
Plaintiff:
Martha Becton , Margaret Castle , Stephen Cobb and others
Defendant:
Zimmer Inc and Zimmer Holdings Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COBBS v. BROWN et al
as 2:2011cv00164
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT R. BROWN, A. HENERY, B. NICE and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY COBBS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COBBS v. BROWN
as 2:2011cv00122
Respondent:
R. BROWN
Petitioner:
ANTHONY COBBS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00430
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WILLIAMS et al v. STEAK N SHAKE OPERATIONS, INC. et al.
as 1:2010cv01321
Plaintiff:
INDIA BARNES, RAMONE COBB, CHRISTINA WILLIAMS and others
Defendant:
SCOTT CRADDOCK and STEAK N SHAKE OPERATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
