Cases 81 - 90 of 325
AlBritton v. Anderson et al
as 7:2022cv00306
Plaintiff:
DeVinche Javon AlBritton
Defendant:
David Anderson, Kimberly Phipps and Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Booth v. Anderson
as 3:2022cv00426
Petitioner:
Terrence Mack Booth
Respondent:
David Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shelton v. Ford et al
as 7:2022cv00289
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Shelton
Defendant:
Amanda C. Ford, B.L. Towler, B.W. Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Booth v. Anderson
as 3:2022cv00398
Petitioner:
Terrence M. Booth
Respondent:
David Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williamson v. Carencro et al
as 6:2022cv01274
Plaintiff:
Marcus Williamson and Marcus J Williamson
Defendant:
Police Dept of Carencro, Keith Thibeaux and David Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alston v. Robinson et al
as 7:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
Ira Alston
Defendant:
A. David Robinson, Brittany Gross, B. O'Donnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stroupe v. Whisnant et al
as 1:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
Bon Alexander Stroupe
Defendant:
Steve Whisnant, Gary Kiser, Taylor Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Etherwan Systems, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00890
Plaintiff:
David Anderson
Defendant:
Etherwan Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Movement Mortgage LLC et al v. Intercontinental Capital Group, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Movement Mortgage LLC, Justin Wiesert, Isaac Alexander and others
Defendant:
Intercontinental Capital Group, Inc.
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2022cv00182
Defendant:
M. D. Sturgill, David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke and others
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
