Cases 81 - 90 of 211
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv01865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Romero v. Darden Restaurants, Inc.
as 0:2017cv61098
Plaintiff:
Rosie Romero
Defendant:
Darden Restaurants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1570
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gardhouse v. N and D Restaurants, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00300
Plaintiff:
Karen Gardhouse
Defendant:
N and D Restaurants, LLC , N and D Restaurants, Inc. , Darden Restaurants, Inc., and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv60661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
WASHINGTON v. LONGHORNE STEAKHOUSE 5303 et al
as 2:2017cv01086
Plaintiff:
SHANING M. WASHINGTON
Defendant:
LONGHORNE STEAKHOUSE 5303 and DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Helping Hand Caregivers, Ltd. v. Darden Restaurants, Inc., et al
as 17-1282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HELPING HAND CAREGIVERS, LTD., an Illinois corporation, individually and as the representative of a class of similarly situated persons
Defendant - Appellee:
DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC., a Florida corporation, MID WILSHIRE CONSULTING, INC., a California corporation, doing business as SOCIAL WELLNESS, BRIAN J. KING and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00393
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
