Cases 81 - 90 of 150
Love v. Clarke et al
as 2:2012cv00754
Plaintiff:
Da Vonte Love
Defendant:
David A Clarke, Jr, Robert Blanco, Susan E Thaller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Clarke et al
as 2:2012cv00738
Plaintiff:
Javaughn Dushawn Roberts
Defendant:
David A Clarke, Jr, Richard Schmdit and Kevin Nyklewicz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Love v. Clarke et al
as 2:2012cv00736
Plaintiff:
Da Vonte Love
Defendant:
David A Clarke, Jr, Richard Schmidt, Kevin Nykelwicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. Clarke et al
as 2:2012cv00737
Plaintiff:
Da Vonte Love
Defendant:
David A Clarke, Jr, Ms Holmes, Ms Sloan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Clarke et al
as 2:2012cv00710
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lamont Bell
Defendant:
David A Clarke, Jr and Robert Sadowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of James Franklin Perry v. Wenzel et al
as 2:2012cv00664
Plaintiff:
Estate of James Franklin Perry
Defendant:
Cheryl Wenzel , Deputy Kickbush , Nicole Virgo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gibson et al v. Milwaukee County et al
as 2:2012cv00657
Plaintiff:
James R Gibson and Tamara Rohr
Defendant:
Milwaukee County , Milwaukee County Sheriffs Department and David A Clarke, Jr
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Monroe v. Brendemuehl et al
as 2:2012cv00528
Plaintiff:
John R Monroe
Defendant:
Christopher T Brendemuehl and David A Clarke, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
London v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2012cv00333
Petitioner:
Keith London
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin , David A Clarke, Jr, Jean DiMotto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gabriel Griffin v. David Clarke, Jr., et al
as 12-1833
Petitioner - Appellant:
GABRIEL GRIFFIN
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID A. CLARKE, JR. and JOHN DOE, sued as John and or Jane Doe(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
