Cases 81 - 90 of 5,025
Clemons v. Jones (#126) et al
as 6:2024cv06026
Plaintiff:
Ovell Daniel Clemons, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer Jones (#126), Officer Smith (#153), Officer McSlone (#118) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lester v. Norwood et al
as 1:2024cv01018
Plaintiff:
Michael Fred Allen Lester
Defendant:
Sheriff David Norwood, Jail Administrator Cameron Owens, Shift Supervisor Amanda Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Putney v. Huntsman et al
as 4:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Stedrick L Putney, Sr
Defendant:
Tad Huntsman, Frank Spain, Sandra Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v Scarface et al
as 4:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Scarface, Al Pacino, Keef Coff Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Joshua Terrell Bell
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennedy v. White County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Kennedy
Defendant:
White County, Arkansas, Phillip Miller, Clayton Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Kidd v. Does
as 4:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Raymond Kidd
Defendant:
Does and Yell County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. John Doe Staff Member
as 5:2024cv05052
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
John Doe Staff Member
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayfield v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
William Mayfield
Defendant:
Doe and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
