Cases 81 - 90 of 269
DARST v. ALTOONA REGIONAL HOSPITAL et al
as 3:2014cv00264
Defendant:
ALTOONA REGIONAL HOSPITAL, SCI HOUTZDALE, DR. MUHAMMAD NAJI and others
Plaintiff:
DUANE CARNELL DARST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hadesty v. Rush Township Police Department et al
as 3:2014cv02319
Plaintiff:
Jeanette Hadesty
Defendant:
Rush Township Police Department, Duane Frederick, Adam Sinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REIF et al v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY et al
as 2:2014cv06549
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY REIF and DUANE REIF
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRADLEY v. COLVIN
as 5:2014cv05482
Plaintiff:
DUANE BRADLEY
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BURKENTIN et al v. PHILADELPHIA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT et al
as 2:2014cv04737
Plaintiff:
HELENA C. BURKENTIN and DUANE B. BURKENTINE
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT and THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
EVANS v. USA
as 1:2014cv00171
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
WILLIS DUANE EVANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JASON HILL v. THE BOROUGH OF DOYLESTOWN et al
as 2:2014cv02975
Plaintiff:
JASON HILL and ELSA HILL
Defendant:
THE BOROUGH OF DOYLESTOWN , THE CENTRAL BUCKS REGIONAL POLICE DEPARTMENT , JAMES DONNELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PURINA ANIMAL NUTRITION LLC v. GATES et al
as 3:2014cv00103
Plaintiff:
PURINA ANIMAL NUTRITION LLC
Defendant:
LON W. GATES, KATHY A. GATES and DUANE GATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAYLOR v. COLEMAN et al
as 5:2014cv02376
Petitioner:
THOMAS DUANE TAYLOR
Respondent:
BRIAN V. COLEMAN and WILLIAM H. PLATT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TAYLOR v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2014cv00516
Petitioner:
THOMAS DUANE TAYLOR
Respondent:
BRIAN V. COLEMAN and WILLIAM H. PLATT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
