Cases 81 - 90 of 99
Sample v. Indiana State Prison et al
as 2:2019cv00220
Defendant:
Mr. Bodlovich, Indiana State Prison, Defendants and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis F Sample, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craft v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2019cv00291
Plaintiff:
William A Craft and William Craft
Defendant:
Jason Henry, Nick Keal, Travis Steffel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEYBA v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2019cv00226
Respondent:
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD, WARDEN and ERIC HOLCOMB
Petitioner:
ERWIN LEYBA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Matlock v. Sevier et al
as 3:2019cv00376
Plaintiff:
Barry W Matlock and Barry Wade Matlock
Defendant:
Greg Sheward, Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Captain Earhardt and others
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snider v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2019cv00049
Plaintiff:
Bill Snider
Defendant:
Schalliol, Court Justices, Deputy AGs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWNER-OPERATOR INDEPENDENT DRIVERS ASSOCIATION et al v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2019cv00086
Defendant:
ITR CONCESSION COMPANY LLC, JOE MCGUINNESS, RUDY YAKYM, III and others
Plaintiff:
MARK ELROD, B. L. REEVER TRANSPORT, INC., CHUTKA TRUCKING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00084
Defendant:
T McNeal, Robert Carter, Verdon and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Kenneth Bruce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HIPPENSTEEL v. HOLCOMB
as 3:2019cv00008
Plaintiff:
DAVID HIPPENSTEEL
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Suding v. Holcomb et al
as 3:2018cv01044
Defendant:
Robert Carter, Eric Holcomb, Charlene Burkett and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Suding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matlock v. Porter et al
as 3:2018cv01007
Defendant:
Yancy, Critiren, Flake and others
Undetermined:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
Barry W Matlock and Barry Wade Matlock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
