Cases 81 - 90 of 129
Johnson v. Financial Business and Consumer Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00498
Plaintiff:
Tamika L. Johnson
Defendant:
Financial Business and Consumer Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Barrios v. Financial Business and Consumer Solutions, Inc.
as 0:2018cv60306
Plaintiff:
Jose Barrios
Defendant:
Financial Business and Consumer Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Goutier v. Financial Business and Consumer Solutions, Inc.
as 0:2018cv60307
Plaintiff:
Leslie Goutier
Defendant:
Financial Business and Consumer Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Modugno v. Financial Business and Consumer Solutions, Inc.
as 8:2017cv02762
Plaintiff:
Rosana Modugno
Defendant:
Financial Business and Consumer Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
JOHNSON v. FINANCIAL BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 2:2017cv04681
Plaintiff:
LAVERNE JOHNSON
Defendant:
FINANCIAL BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ROMERO v. Financial Business and Consumer Solutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv14339
Plaintiff:
JUAN HACHE ROMERO
Defendant:
Financial Business and Consumer Solutions, Inc. and Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DILWORTH v. FINANCIAL BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 2:2017cv03393
Plaintiff:
ERIKA DILWORTH
Defendant:
FINANCIAL BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
