Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 81 - 90 of 504
BROWN v. CORIZON HEALTH, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02184
Plaintiff: QUANJY BROWN
Defendant: CORIZON HEALTH, INC. , EKE NDUBISI KALU, SIDDHARTH SAGREIYA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLOYD v. KAUFFMAN et al
as 2:2015cv01453
Plaintiff: ANTHONY LEONARD FLOYD
Defendant: JEFFREY KAUFFMAN and APPLEHILL SURGICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00950
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
STRAND v. STEWARD et al
as 2:2015cv00817
Plaintiff: REGAN STRAND
Defendant: MATTHEW STEWARD, FLOYD C. LEWIS and THE CITY OF CHESTER, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLOYD v. FIVE UNKNOWN, UNITED STATES MARSHALS
as 2:2015cv00345
Plaintiff: DARRELL FLOYD
Defendant: FIVE UNKNOWN, UNITED STATES MARSHALS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2679
Floyd v. Commonwealth et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv02279
Petitioner: Charles Floyd, Jr.
Respondent: Commonwealth and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FLOWERS et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv06356
Plaintiff: ANTHONY FLOWERS , JUDAH WILLIAMS , BRADY FLOYD and others
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JEFFREY WALKER, THOMAS LICIARDELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00212
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
FLOYD v. DOC-SCI CHESTER
as 2:2014cv05470
Plaintiff: ANTHONY LEONARD FLOYD
Defendant: DOC-SCI CHESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRANCIS v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 2:2014cv05176
Plaintiff: FLOYD STANHOPE FRANCIS
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BOARDER PROTECTION and PETE GIZAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?