Cases 81 - 90 of 114
Nowlin v. Bohdan et al
as 1:2012cv00283
Plaintiff:
Otha Henry Nowlin, III
Defendant:
John C Bohdan, Karen Richards, Commander Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUNDEEN v. KELLY
as 1:2012cv00696
Defendant:
FRANCES L. KELLY
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. LUNDEEN, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GARZA v. GORMAN et al
as 1:2012cv00618
Defendant:
DARREN R. COVINGTON, SEAN GORMAN, INDIANA PROFESSIONAL LICENSING AGENCY and others
Plaintiff:
ERNESTINE (MOORE) GARZA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roy v. Ware et al
as 2:2012cv00101
Plaintiff:
Kevin D Roy
Defendant:
Glen Ware, Louis, James Nielsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Buncich et al
as 2:2012cv00034
Plaintiff:
Robert L Burns
Defendant:
John Buncich, Mr Kumorek, Mrs Gore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ESHELMAN et al v. JEFFREY D. STANTON, P.C.
as 1:2011cv01634
Plaintiff:
DENNIS K. ESHELMAN and FRANCES K. ESHELMAN
Defendant:
JEFFREY D. STANTON, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
HOLYFIELD v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2011cv00947
Defendant:
MR. BUCHMANN, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, MS. MICHELE KIEFER and others
Plaintiff:
RANDY HOLYFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Torres v. University Of Notre Dame Du Lac The et al
as 3:2011cv00209
Plaintiff:
Karen Torres
Defendant:
University Of Notre Dame Du Lac The , Phillip Johnson , Frances Shavers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
