Cases 81 - 90 of 465
General Electric Capital Corporation et al v. GE Commercial Distribution Finance Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv00409
Plaintiff:
General Electric Capital Corporation , NMHG Financial Services, Inc. , GE Capital Commercial Inc. and others
Defendant:
KMH Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Benson v. General Electric Capital Corporation
as 6:2013cv02035
Plaintiff:
Shondalae Benson
Defendant:
General Electric Capital Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01978
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
General Electric Capital Corporation v. Harless
as 4:2013cv00145
Plaintiff:
General Electric Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Larry Harless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv04999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv05000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv04998
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
General Electric Capital Corporation v. Chambers
as 3:2013cv01185
Plaintiff:
General Electric Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Thomas Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv04994
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
General Electric Capital Corporation
as 6:2013mc00369
Appellant:
General Electric Capital Corporation
Appellee:
Hilco Industrial LLC
Debtor:
Pacific Cargo Services, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
