Cases 81 - 90 of 142
Gentry Smith v. V. Horton, et al
as 15-60227
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GENTRY TRE-MAINE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
V. HORTON, Warden at East Mississippi Correctional Facility, GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED, Operator of East Mississippi Correctional Facility, BART GRIMES, Warden at East Mississippi Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1614
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Darwin Gauthier v. A L C Medical, et al
as 14-31013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARWIN GAUTHIER
Defendant - Appellee:
A L C MEDICAL, G E O MEDICAL STAFF, ANGELA EASOM and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lindgren v. Mauldin et al
as 2:2014cv01501
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lindgren
Defendant:
Rick Mauldin, Cindy Bergen, Mohammed Haleem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. GEO Group Incorporated
as 2:2014mc00025
Petitioner:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Respondent:
GEO Group Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mario Naranjo v. Bobby Thompson, et al
as 14-50200
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIO NARANJO
Defendant - Appellee:
BOBBY THOMPSON, GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED, GEORGE ZOLY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Daniel Oriakhi v. GEO Group, Incorporated, et al
as 13-11269
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ORIAKHI
Defendant - Appellee:
GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED, DAVID JUSTICE, Warden, JAMES GRANT, Assistant Warden and others
Antonio Scroggins v. GEO Group, Incorporated, et al
as 13-31054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO SCROGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED, WAYNE CALABRESE, ANTHONY ALLEMAND and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.