Cases 81 - 90 of 195
Thomley et al v. Synergy Refrigeration, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00241
Plaintiff:
Neeka Thomley , Ricky W. Cochran , Greg Smith and others
Defendant:
Synergy Refrigeration, Inc., Doug Sweet and Gary Gilley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Clark v. Smith et al
as 3:2014cv00129
Petitioner:
Erskine Clark, Sr.
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Greg Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gregory Amato v. Greg Smith, et al
as 14-15434
Petitioner - Appellant:
GREGORY AMATO
Respondent - Appellee:
GREG SMITH and NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Garza-Martinez v. Smith et al
as 3:2014cv00109
Petitioner:
Roberto Garza-Martinez
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Greg Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mascarenas v. Smith et al
as 3:2014cv00054
Petitioner:
Raymond Mascarenas
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Greg Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv31762
Plaintiff:
Theresa Smith and Greg Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Almy v. Bannister et al
as 3:2013cv00645
Plaintiff:
Kevin Almy
Defendant:
R. Bannister, Cheryl Burson, Catherine Cortez Masto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Almy v. Brandon Davis, et al
as 13-17257
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN ALMY
Defendant - Appellee:
BRANDON DAVIS, Correctional Officer at LCC, J. BUTTON, CSSi (Caseworker) at WSCC, ERIC FANCHER, NDOC Correctional Officer and others
Gdisis v. Smith
as 2:2013cv01172
Plaintiff:
Ernest Wayne Gdisis
Defendant:
Greg Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cory Winans v. CCS Thomas, et al
as 13-17011
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CORY K. WINANS
Defendant - Appellee:
CCS THOMAS, GREG SMITH, A. W.O. MATTICE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
