Cases 81 - 90 of 135
Vaughn et al v. Griffith et al
as 2:2015cv00140
Defendant:
CR England Inc and Remark Griffith
Plaintiff:
Marion "Gene" Vaughn and Alice L Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Griffith v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2015cv01282
Petitioner:
Dennis Griffith
Respondent:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barnes v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv00298
Defendant:
Lisa David, John Bradley, Nick Richter and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Griffith v. Rupert et al
as 6:2015cv00317
Defendant:
John Rupert, Vickie Barrow, Gaye Karriker and others
Plaintiff:
Wilbur Griffith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffith v. City of Arlington, Texas et al
as 4:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
Daniel Griffith
Defendant:
City of Arlington, Texas , Charlie Parker , Kathryn Wilemon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kroll et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv03955
Plaintiff:
Brenda Kroll , Mary Kathleen Katchur , Kathy Donald and others
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Petitioner:
Martha Harp and Patsy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffith Oilfield Services, Inc v. Colony Insurance Company et al
as 1:2014cv00424
Plaintiff:
Griffith Oilfield Services, Inc
Defendant:
Colony Insurance Company and B&W Insurance Group, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rigsby et al v. American Medical Systems Inc
as 3:2014cv02995
Defendant:
American Medical Systems Inc
Plaintiff:
Lia Rigsby , Bunnie Piehowski , Janet Aherens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffith v. Pamerleau
as 5:2014cv00591
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Griffith
Defendant:
Susan L. Pamerleau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffith v. Pamerleau
as 5:2014cv00523
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Griffith, Sr.
Respondent:
Bexar County Sheriff Susan Pamerleau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
