Cases 81 - 90 of 1,095
Taylor v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv02200
Plaintiff:
Charlie Ray Taylor
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Michael Britt, Ariel M. Burks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller et al v. McDonald et al
as 1:2023cv00484
Plaintiff:
Joseph Miller, Wengerd Ezra, Jonas Smucker and others
Defendant:
Dr. James V. McDonald and Dr. Betty A. Rosa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KING v. KAUFFMAN
as 2:2023cv02145
Petitioner:
JONAS KING
Respondent:
KEVIN KAUFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
North Star Mutual Insurance Company v. Jonas et al
as 6:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
North Star Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Dawson Jonas, Dawson Does It Plumbing, Inc., Bradley Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv60793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv21593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
