Cases 81 - 90 of 2,759
MARTIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv01866
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MARTIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Taveras v. Jaddou et al
as 1:2023cv01777
Plaintiff:
Kevin Taveras
Defendant:
Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Tony Bryson and Angela Klapakis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01776
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Johnson
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections doing business as SCI-Dallas, Kevin Ranson, Jason Bohinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Horton v. Mills, Jr.
as 4:2023cv01768
Plaintiff:
Kevin Horton
Defendant:
Matthew G. Mills, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lowman v. Salamon et al
as 1:2023cv01731
Plaintiff:
Yasim Lowman
Defendant:
Bobbi Jo Salamon, Kevin Brubaker, Lieutenant Vogts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRYOR v. BUREAU OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES et al
as 2:2023cv01791
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK D. PRYOR, IV
Defendant:
BUREAU OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES, BOBBI JO SALAMON, KERI MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SAVAGE v. YES CARE INC.
as 2:2023cv03983
Defendant:
YES CARE INC., CORIZON HEALTH and TEHUM CASE SERVICES
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SAVAGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FAISON v. MASON et al
as 2:2023cv03960
Petitioner:
KENNETH FAISON
Respondent:
BERNADETTE MASON, KEVIN R. STEELE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
IN RE: KEVIN D. RAMEE GREEN
as 2:2023cv03947
Petitioner:
KEVIN D. RAMEE GREEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
