Cases 81 - 90 of 182
Lawson v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv02336
Plaintiff:
Jeniffer Lawson
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Miscellaneou:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Estes v. Hawkins County Justice Center et al
as 2:2015cv00095
Plaintiff:
Donald Eric Estes
Defendant:
Hawkins County Justice Center, Southern Health Partners, Dr. Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haycraft v. Lawson et al
as 2:2015cv00090
Plaintiff:
Scotty Lee Haycraft
Defendant:
Ronnie Lawson, Butch Gallion and Southern Health Partners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (PLR1)
as 3:2015cv00119
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Lawson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Carsmart, LLC v. Lawson Autos, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00251
Plaintiff:
Carsmart, LLC
Defendant:
Lawson Autos, LLC and Leonard Lawson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Herron v. Voyles et al
as 2:2015cv02145
Plaintiff:
Keith Herron
Defendant:
D. Voyles, J. Cline, R Woolley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02021
Plaintiff:
Robert Lawson
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King et al v. Lawson et al (PLR1)
as 3:2014cv00527
Plaintiff:
Billie King and Felisha K. Meadows
Defendant:
Jason Lawson , Jason Stokes and City of Clinton, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King et al v. Lawson et al (TV3)
as 3:2014cv00500
Plaintiff:
Billie King and Felisha K Meadows
Defendant:
Jason Lawson , Jason Stokes , City of Clinton, Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. Midland Funding, LLC et al (TV3)
as 3:2014cv00410
Plaintiff:
Velna Lawson
Defendant:
Midland Funding, LLC and Hosto & Buchan, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
