Cases 81 - 90 of 174
GILLESPY v. LANES et al
as 1:2014cv00376
Plaintiff:
DAWONDA GILLESPY
Defendant:
CARLOS H LANES and MARTEN TRANSPORT LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LOVE et al v. PENCE
as 4:2014cv00015
Plaintiff:
ERIN BROCK, JO ANN DALE, MICHAEL DRURY and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL RICHARD PENCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00137
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
USA v. Parcel of Real Property Known As 112 Chapel Lane Ashley DeKalb County Indiana et al
as 1:2014cv00021
Defendant:
Parcel of Real Property Known As 112 Chapel Lane Ashley DeKalb County Indiana, Crystal Slone-Myers, Unknown Heirs and Devisees of and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
MARK ALAN LANE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2014cv00001
Petitioner:
MARK ALAN LANE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LANE v. ZATECKY
as 1:2014cv00007
Petitioner:
MICHAEL V. LANE
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LANE v. SPAINHOUR
as 1:2013cv01980
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN LANE
Defendant:
MARVIN SPAINHOUR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COX et al v. CA HOLDING INC. et al
as 1:2013cv01754
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BROWN, LUCINDA COX, DEVIN HARLEY and others
Defendant:
CA HOLDING INC., CACH LLC, CACH OF NJ LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
LANE v. USA
as 3:2013cv00184
Petitioner:
MARK A. LANE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LANE v. CABEZAS
as 1:2013cv01430
Defendant:
MARTA M. CABEZAS
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
