Cases 81 - 90 of 445
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00304
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Shearer v. Miller et al
as 0:2020cv00066
Defendant:
Jill Miller and Dr. Frederick Kemen, MD
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Shearer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv00078
Defendant:
J. Adkins, J. Preston, Officer Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Timmy Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nemes et al v. Bensinger et al
as 3:2020cv00407
Defendant:
Sarah Rogers, Marilyn Dishman, Jack Snograss and others
Plaintiff:
Ken Kearns, Erik Hermes, James "Rich" Howland and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Keisha Dorsey
Intervenor:
Amy McGrath for Senate, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
O'Bannon v. Miller
as 3:2020cv00367
Defendant:
Paul L. Miller
Plaintiff:
Rodricka O'Bannon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 mv
Miller v. Batson et al
as 3:2020cv00310
Defendant:
Mark Batson, Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government, LMPD Officer 7072 and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas E. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thomason v. Martin et al
as 3:2020cv00255
Plaintiff:
Dominique Thomason
Defendant:
Elijah Martin and Miller Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 mv
Mallory v. Miller et al
as 3:2020cv00249
Plaintiff:
James Mallory and Sadigga Al-Rahman Muhammad
Defendant:
Lt. Miller, Major William Ashby, Sgt Christopher Wedding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fyffe et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv00073
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Enos Miller and Calice May Fyffe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
