Cases 81 - 90 of 274
Adkins et al v. Bradford County Probation & Parole Department et al
as 4:2018cv00624
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Karl Adkins and Keith Fitzwater
Defendant:
Bradford County Probation & Parole Department, Bradford County Public Defender's Office, Dawn Close and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BIDAMIN v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2018cv00287
Plaintiff:
MAUREEN BIDAMIN
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
HENSLEY v. SKERDA et al
as 1:2018cv00044
Petitioner:
JOSEPH HENSLEY
Respondent:
MAUREEN SKERDA, CALEB GNAGE and ELIZABETH ZIEGLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TCHATCHOUA v. PETERMAN et al
as 2:2017cv01619
Plaintiff:
MAXWELL TCHATCHOUA
Defendant:
JOHN PETERMAN, BERNARD SCOTT, JEREMY ERKEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREED et al v. NORTH AMERICAN COMPANY FOR LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE
as 2:2017cv05595
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM FREED and MAUREEN FREED
Defendant:
NORTH AMERICAN COMPANY FOR LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Breese v. Kurtz et al
as 4:2017cv01678
Plaintiff:
Jerry Breese
Defendant:
Trey Kurtz, Maureen T. Beirne and Jonathon Wilcox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DORCZUK v. DORCZUK et al
as 2:2017cv03965
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY DORCZUK
Defendant:
ANN DORCZUK and MAUREEN P. DOYLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOBO et al v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
as 2:2017cv03968
Plaintiff:
MADLYNE BOBO , EMA HERNANDEZ , RONALD HUGHES and others
Defendant:
BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vitez et al v. Santander Bank, N.A.
as 3:2017cv01251
Plaintiff:
David Vitez , Maureen Vitez and DMS Enterprizes, Inc
Defendant:
Santander Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00903
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
