Cases 81 - 90 of 116
Gabriel v. Baltimore City Detention Center (BCDC)
as 1:2012cv02794
Plaintiff:
Steven Gabriel
Defendant:
Baltimore City Detention Center (BCDC), Tier Officer Jane/John Doe, McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2012cv02759
Plaintiff:
Janine McDonald
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cunningham v. Sheckles et al
as 8:2012cv01336
Plaintiff:
Darnell Anthony Cunningham
Defendant:
Sheckles, Longhorn, Burkette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald v. The Montgomery County Correctional Facility et al
as 8:2012cv01089
Plaintiff:
Neal Eugene McDonald
Defendant:
The Montgomery County Correctional Facility and J. Patrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burt et al v. Maasberg et al
as 1:2012cv00464
Defendant:
William T Comfort, Jr, William T Comfort, III, Wolfgang Maasberg and others
Plaintiff:
David R Burt, Janet H Burt, Texas Barrington LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Mcdonald et al
as 8:2012cv00439
Plaintiff:
Levone Jones
Defendant:
Arnold Mcdonald and Richard Gutirrez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivas v. McDonald's Corporation
as 8:2012cv00049
Plaintiff:
Noe Fernandez Rivas
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Murray v. Corporate Headquarters McDonald's Corporation
as 8:2011cv03527
Plaintiff:
Terrell M. Murray
Defendant:
Corporate Headquarters McDonald's Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ace American Insurance Co. et al v. McDonald's Corporation
as 1:2011cv03150
Plaintiff:
Ace American Insurance Co. and Dunbar Armored, Inc.
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
