Cases 81 - 90 of 118
Lerille et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as LAE/2:12-cv-01105
Plaintiff:
Wayne William Lerille and Nancy Lee Lerille
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson and Johnson
Hunter v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2012cv00630
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Nancy Lee Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv06352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Acuna et al v. CMH Homes, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00927
Plaintiff:
Vincent Acuna, Jr., Jorge Aguilar O.J.R., Brian Albrecht and others
Defendant:
CMH Homes, Inc., CMH Manufacturing, Inc. and Clayton Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Acuna et al v. CMH Homes, Inc. et al
as 6:2011cv00295
Plaintiff:
Vincent Acuna, Jr., Jorge Aguilar O.J.R., Brian Albrecht and others
Defendant:
CMH Homes, Inc., CMH Manufacturing, Inc. and Clayton Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Perry v. Flint
as 5:2011cv00184
Plaintiff:
Jason Perry
Defendant:
Nancy Lee Flint
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Linton v. Douglas Johnson, et al
as 11-50549
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN LINTON
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUGLAS JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and NANCY LEE GRAHN
USA v. Nancy Tan
as 11-16411
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NANCY LEE TAN, AKA Nancy Tan Pua, AKA Nancy Tan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MCFADDEN et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65565
Plaintiff:
CHARLES R MCFADDEN and NANCY LEE MCFADDEN
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
