Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 81 - 90 of 278
JACKSON v. WOODS-SKIPPER et al
as 2:2017cv01357
Plaintiff: NEIL D. JACKSON
Defendant: SHEILA A. WOODS-SKIPPER and MARSHA ALLEN-NEIFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENTLEY v. NEIL et al
as 2:2017cv04697
Plaintiff: WILLIE M. BENTLEY
Defendant: NEIL, ADAMS, BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHORT v. ADAMS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv04544
Plaintiff: HARVEY PATRICK SHORT
Defendant: ADAMS, NEIL, BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gilmore et al v. Holland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv01781
Plaintiff: Stephen Gilmore and Karen Gilmore
Defendant: Neil R. Holland, Randle H. Storm , Geisinger Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
O'Hara v. Mosher et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00916
Plaintiff: Thomas O'Hara
Defendant: Neil Mosher and Mark Berkoski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02256
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
LIONTI v. DIPNA, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01678
Plaintiff: PHILIP LIONTI
Defendant: DIPNA, INC. , NEIL SHAH and CHAPMAN HOSPITALITY INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCIALLO v. INDUCTOTHERM CORP. et al
as 2:2017cv01363
Plaintiff: NEIL SCIALLO
Defendant: INDUCTOTHERM CORP. and THERMATOOL CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BROWN v. CHESTER COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2017cv01053
Plaintiff: DEMETRIUS BROWN
Defendant: CHESTER COUNTY PRISON, PSYCOLOGY DEPARTMENT, OLIVE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEHANNA v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2017cv00105
Plaintiff: MELISSA BEHANNA
Defendant: ALLEGHENY COUNTY, ORLANDO HARPER, LATOYA WARREN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?