Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 81 - 90 of 184
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv02703
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PIERRE v. US DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
as 2:2017cv01692
Plaintiff: DONY PIERRE
Defendant: US DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERRE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
as 2:2017cv01330
Plaintiff: DONY PIERRE
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Movant: MICHAEL JP WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
HUGLER v CULTURE MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017mc00104
Petitioner: EDWARD C. HUGLER
Respondent: CULTURE MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC and CLAUDY PIERRE
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
HARMON et al v. FMC CORPORATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv06073
Plaintiff: MATTHEW B. HARMON and SUSAN H. CLARKE
Defendant: FMC CORPORATION , EMPLOYEE WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN COMMITTEE OF FMC CORPORATION , PIERRE BRONDEAU and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
AZOR v. DECKER et al
as 3:2016cv00222
Petitioner: PIERRE RICHARD AZOR
Respondent: THOMAS DECKER, KENT J. FREDERICK and ASSISTANT CHIEF COUNSEL IN CHARGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PAYEN v. BAUSMAN et al
as 2:2016cv05276
Plaintiff: VILDROPHE PIERRE PAYEN
Defendant: KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, LEON RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
PIERRE v. WARDEN
as 3:2016cv00212
Petitioner: RONEL PIERRE
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PIERRE v. USA
as 2:2016cv00863
Petitioner: REGAN TEVIN PIERRE
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jean-Pierre v. Lynch
as 1:2016cv00860
Petitioner: Stephen Jean-Pierre
Respondent: Loretta E. Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?