Cases 81 - 90 of 101
Ralph Mlaska v. Paul Talbot, et al
as 12-2282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RALPH W. MLASKA
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL TALBOT, RICHARD WOLF, ARTHUR FUNK, Doctor and others
Wolfe et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp20702
Plaintiff:
Richard Wolfe and Laura S. Wolfe
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wolfe et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as OHN/1:12-dp-20702
Plaintiff:
Richard Wolfe and Laura S. Wolfe
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Deon Gentry v. County of Wayne, et al
as 11-2221
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DEON LARON GENTRY
Defendant - Appellant:
COUNTY OF WAYNE, DANIEL J. CARMONA, WARREN EVANS and others
Bullock v. Wolf
as 11-3281
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rasaun Bullock
Defendant - Appellee:
Richard Wolf, Executive Director, Board of Corrections, Dora Schriro, Commissioner, Department of Corrections, New York City and others
Mlaska v Talbot et al
as 2:2011cv02084
Plaintiff:
Ralph W Mlaska
Defendant:
Paul Talbot, Arhtur Funk, Richard Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
El-Bey Dunaway v. Board of Correction
as 11-758
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dwight El-Bey Dunaway
Defendant - Appellee:
Board of Corrections, Stanley Kreitman, John R. Horan and others
Karl Storz Endoscopy-America Inc v. Richard Wolf Medical Instruments Corp.,
as 1:2011cv01149
Plaintiff:
Karl Storz Endoscopy-America Inc
Defendant:
Richard Wolf Medical Instruments Corp.,
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Bullock v. Wolf et al
as 1:2011cv01118
Plaintiff:
Rasaun Bullock
Defendant:
Richard Wolf, Dora Schriro, NYC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
-LB El-Bey Dunaway v. Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv04770
Defendant:
Board of Corrections, Chair John R. Horan, Louis Cruz and others
Plaintiff:
Dwight S.B. El-Bey Dunaway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
