Cases 81 - 90 of 94
Crosby v. Richmond City Police Officer Godwin
as 2:2008cv00171
Petitioner:
Michael F. Crosby
Respondent:
Richmond City Police Officer Godwin
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dugas v. Hanover County Circuit Court et al
as 3:2008cv00072
Plaintiff:
Greg Lee Dugas
Defendant:
Hanover County Circuit Court and Richmond City Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Morrison v. Richmond City Jail et al
as 2:2008cv00098
Plaintiff:
Alvin D. Morrison
Defendant:
Richmond City Jail, Richmond Sheriffs Dept. and V.C.U. Police
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bellamy v. Chesapeake Correctional Center et al
as 3:2007cv00564
Plaintiff:
James Edward Bellamy, Jr.
Defendant:
Chesapeake Correctional Center and Richmond City Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Malone v. Ford
as 07-7395
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WADE A. MALONE
Defendant - Appellee:
FORD, Mr., Nurse at Facility, Richmond City Jail and INFIRMARY STAFF, Richmond City Jail
Carpenter v. Richmond City Jail et al
as 3:2007cv00480
Plaintiff:
Claude Bernard Carpenter
Defendant:
Richmond City Jail, W. Burnette, Gaines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Richmond City Jail
as 2:2007cv00357
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Williams
Defendant:
Richmond City Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Sexual Harassment
Thomas v. Richmond City Jails Classification Office
as 2:2007cv00303
Plaintiff:
Jermond Lamont Thomas
Defendant:
Richmond City Jails Classification Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
