Cases 81 - 90 of 142
Croft v. Houston
as 4:2009cv03185
Petitioner:
Seth Croft
Respondent:
Robert Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chapman Moore v. Plock et al
as 8:2009cv00285
Plaintiff:
Michele Cherie Chapman Moore
Defendant:
Joyce Plock, State of Nebraska, York Penitentary (Prison) for Women and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Diamantopoulos v. Britton et al
as 4:2009cv03173
Plaintiff:
Yourgos Diamantopoulos
Defendant:
Fred Britton, Robert Houston, Board of Pardons Neb. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Houston
as 4:2009cv03174
Petitioner:
Earl Mitchell, Jr.
Respondent:
Robert Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Owen v. Houston
as 4:2009cv03170
Petitioner:
Raymond C. Owen
Respondent:
Robert Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Epting v. Houston
as 4:2009cv03158
Petitioner:
John C. Epting, Sr.
Respondent:
Robert Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pratt v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2009cv00223
Petitioner:
Juneal Pratt
Respondent:
State of Nebraska, Robert Houston and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patterson v. Houston
as 4:2009cv03139
Petitioner:
Frederick P. Patterson
Respondent:
Robert Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cogill v. Houston et al
as 8:2009cv00209
Plaintiff:
Jesse Cogill
Defendant:
Robert Houston, Fred Britten, Giser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Houston
as 8:2009cv00204
Petitioner:
David Gonzales
Respondent:
Robert Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
