Cases 81 - 90 of 611
Christensen et al v. Liberty Utilities (CalPeco Electric) LLC
as 2:2021at01159
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott Christensen, Shad Lafonties, Michael Scott Avis and others
Defendant:
Liberty Utilities (CalPeco Electric) LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Robert Kennedy
as 21-14181
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT SCOTT KENNEDY, a.k.a. Robbie Kennedy
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
YOUNG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv02612
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SCOTT YOUNG and RONALD SCOTT YOUNG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCOTT v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE
as 2:2021cv04645
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SCOTT
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Merrill et al v. McCord et al
as 4:2021cv00761
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott Merrill and Nancy L Merrill
Defendant:
Samuel McCord and Danna Southerland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Connie Jerome, et al v. Robert Barnack, et al
as 21-16676
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CONNIE JEROME and JAMES VAN DYKE
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT SCOTT BARNACK
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE U.S. TRUSTEE, Sacramento and DOUGLAS M. WHATLEY, Trustee
Kirkham, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv01095
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott Kirkham, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Romero v. Select Interior Concepts, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05539
Plaintiff:
Viviana Romero
Defendant:
Select Interior Concepts, Inc., Donald McAleenan, Robert Scott Vansant and others
Jones v. Select Interior Concepts, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv08138
Plaintiff:
John Jones
Defendant:
Select Interior Concepts, Inc., L.W. Varner, Jr., S. Tracy Coster and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
