Cases 81 - 90 of 260
MCLEAN v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00752
Plaintiff:
SCOTTIE MCLEAN and ROGER PERRY
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., DAVID RICHARDSON, CIEMONE EASTER-ROSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABDUL-GHAFOOR, et al v. PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATOIN, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv00024
Plaintiff:
RHODA KATHLEEN BLAIR, LINDA COHILL, GUY E. DONA and others
Defendant:
RONALD D. ROMAIN and PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
HAVILL v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2019cv00337
Plaintiff:
RYAN HAVILL
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION and ROSE-HULMAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INDIANA LABORERS PENSION FUND v. SPENCER
as 2:2018cv00535
Defendant:
ROSE SPENCER
Plaintiff:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INDIANA LABORERS PENSION FUND
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Rose v. CNH Industrial America LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00458
Plaintiff:
Cherie Rose
Defendant:
CNH Industrial America LLC and Todd Mader
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTIN v. ALSIP et al
as 1:2018cv03839
Defendant:
PRAITOR, BARGIT, BYDEM and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY C. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSE et al v. MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2018cv03624
Defendant:
WATERS, MILLER, HECTOR CHULIO and others
Plaintiff:
MARY ROSE and CODY ROSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEATY v. SARTEN et al
as 1:2018cv03181
Defendant:
T COBLE, EASTER ROSE, M SARTEN and others
Plaintiff:
DEREK A BEATY and DEREK A. BEATY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beaty v. Sarten et al
as 1:2018cv00323
Defendant:
T Coble, Easter Rose, M Sarten and others
Plaintiff:
Derek A Beaty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Biomet, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00807
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics LLC, Biomet, Inc., Biomet U.S. Reconstruction, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Rose Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
