Cases filed in Montana
Cases 81 - 90 of 100
Alliance for the Wild Rockies, et al. v. Hammond et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2025cv00012
Plaintiff: Alliance for the Wild Rockies and Council on Fish & Wildlife
Defendant: Katharine Hammond, Cameron Sholly and National Park Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2025cv00012
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Alliance for the Wild Rockies et al v. Mulholland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2025cv00005
Plaintiff: Council on Wildlife and Fish, Native Ecosystems Council, Alliance for the Wild Rockies and others
Defendant: United States Forest Service and William Mulholland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company v. Franz Construction Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2025cv00005
Defendant: Grizzly Coil Tubing Services, Inc., Arlon Franz, Franz Construction Inc. and others
Plaintiff: St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company
Counter-Claimant: Grizzly Coil Tubing Services, Inc., Don Franz, Arlon Franz and others
Counter-Defendant: St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Type: Contract Insurance
State of Montana et al v. Haaland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00180
Plaintiff: Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, State of Montana and Montana Department of Livestock
Defendant: Charles F. Sams, United States Department of Interior, Deb Haaland and others
Intervenor: Cottonwood Environmental Law Center, Sierra Club, Montana Chapter, Fort Peck Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes and others
Cross-Complainant: Sierra Club, Montana Chapter and Cottonwood Environmental Law Center
Cross-Defendant: Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, Montana Department of Livestock and State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Friends of the Bitterroot et al v. Haaland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2024cv00169
Plaintiff: Native Ecosystems Council, Friends of the Bitterroot, Wildearth Guardians and others
Defendant: Randy Moore, Martha Williams, Deb Haaland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332 Environmental Policy - Coop of Agency Reports
Schreiber v. United Parcel Service, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2024cv00163
Defendant: United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff: Tim Schreiber
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Yellowstone Valley Audubon Society v. Haaland et al
as 1:2024cv00164
Defendant: Deb Haaland, Martha Williams, The Department of the Interior and others
Plaintiff: Yellowstone Valley Audubon Society
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332 Environmental Policy - Coop of Agency Reports
Wright et al v. Shelby Distributors, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00100
Plaintiff: Jon Q Wright and JQ Licensing, LLC
Defendant: Robert Curtiss d/b/a CURTISS SERVICE CENTER and Shelby Distributors, LLC d/b/a EAGLE BEVERAGE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Rutherford et al v. Health Care Service Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2024cv00081
Plaintiff: Johnny C. Rutherford, Jr. and Johnny Rutherford
Defendant: Montana University System and Health Care Service Corporation A Mutual Legal Reserve Company, doing business in Montana as Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Montana, doing business as Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?