Cases 81 - 90 of 18,900
Castro-Lituma v. Garland
as 24-1373
Petitioner:
KLEVER ANTONIO CASTRO-LITUMA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rivera-Reino v. Garland
as 24-1378
Petitioner:
SAUL MAURICIO RIVERA-REINO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Reyes-Galvez v. Garland
as 24-1381
Petitioner:
ANA MARINA REYES-GALVEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jones, Brent M. v. Yarusso et al
as 1:2024cv21958
Plaintiff:
Brent Michael Jones and Brent Micheal Jones
Defendant:
A. Yarusso, H. Fitoria, B. Campos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Vargas v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv01901
Plaintiff:
Rosa Vargas
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and United States Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Sturgeon v. Paxton, Attorney General of the State of Texas in his Official Capacity, Only et al
as 4:2024cv01907
Plaintiff:
Paul Sturgeon
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of Texas in his Official Capacity, Only, Texas State Attorney General and Harris County Texas Commission Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sikder v. Garland
as 24-1362
Petitioner:
MOHAMMED LOKMAN SIKDER, FARJANA AKTER, MOHAMMED SAFWAN SIKDER and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rodriguez-Cecias v. Garland
as 24-1367
Petitioner:
DONNY ANDRE RODRIGUEZ-CECIAS, KARLA STEPHANIE MIRANDA-MANRIQUE and EITHAN SEBASTIAN RODRIGUEZ-MIRANDA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nava-Capilla v. Garland
as 24-9534
Petitioner:
ANTONIO NAVA-CAPILLA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
