Cases 81 - 90 of 442
Williamson v. UPS et al
as 2:2019cv02506
Defendant:
UPS, Chris Gay and Chris Verbeck
Plaintiff:
Andy T. Williamson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dixon v. Foreman et al
as 5:2019cv03153
Defendant:
Joe Nic, (fnu) Ali, (fnu) (lnu) (2) and others
Plaintiff:
Dijon T. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02434
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Phillips et al v. Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust et al
as 2:2019cv02402
Defendant:
Lawrence J. McManamon, Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust, Mark Vandiver and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Egger, Kevin D. Murphy, Thomas Allen Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Derichs v. AT&T Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02368
Defendant:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., AT&T Integrated Disability Service Center and AT&T Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Daniel Derichs
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02361
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
T-Mobile Central LLC et al v. Wichita, City of et al
as 6:2019cv01162
Plaintiff:
T-Mobile Central LLC and APC Towers III, LLC
Defendant:
Wichita, City of and Wichita City Council
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02274
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02275
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
United States of America v. Harrington et al
as 2:2019cv02236
Defendant:
Luke T. Harrington, Holly A. Harrington, Luke Trent Harrington and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
