Cases 81 - 90 of 249
(PC) Barnes v. T.V. Network et al
as 2:2020cv01859
Defendant:
T.V. Network, All Rap Music Icons, Videos, D. Trump and others
Plaintiff:
Antoine Deshawn Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Barnes v. T.V. Network et al
as 1:2020cv01331
Defendant:
T.V. Network, All Rap Music Icons, Videos, D. Trump and others
Plaintiff:
Antoine Deshawn Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv06049
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Rock The Vote et al v. Trump et al
as 3:2020cv06021
Defendant:
Wilbur Jr. Ross, Douglas W. Kinkoph, William P. Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Free Press, MapLight, Common Cause and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Zvi Kriple v. Donald J. Trump
as 2:2020cv07852
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump
Plaintiff:
Zvi Kriple
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ryan v. Trump et al
as 3:2020cv05948
Plaintiff:
Patrick S. Ryan
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump and Wilbur L. Ross
Amicus Curiae:
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TikTok Inc. et al v. U.S. Department of Commerce et al
as 2:2020cv07672
Plaintiff:
TikTok Inc. and Bytedance Ltd.
Defendant:
Wilbur L Ross, Jr., U.S. Department of Commerce and Donald J. Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
(PC) Hairston v. CDCR et al
as 1:2020cv01226
Defendant:
US Courts, CDCR Wardens, CDCR Doctors and others
Plaintiff:
Robey Hairston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Robey Hairston v. CDCR et al
as 2:2020cv01680
Defendant:
US Courts, CDCR Wardens, CDCR Doctors and others
Plaintiff:
Robey Hairston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
U.S. WeChat Users Alliance et al v. Trump et al
as 3:2020cv05910
Plaintiff:
Elaine Peng, Chihuo Inc., U.S. WeChat Users Alliance and others
Defendant:
Wilbur Ross and Donald J. Trump
Interested Party:
Dirk Langer
Intervenor:
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
