Cases 81 - 90 of 121
Michael McHugh v. County of Pima, et al
as 14-15247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MCHUGH
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF PIMA, CLERENCE W. DUPNIK, Sheriff, CITY OF TUCSON and others
Dawkins v. South Tucson Police Department
as 4:2014cv00468
Plaintiff:
Elkino Denard Dawkins
Defendant:
South Tucson Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elem v. Tucson City Prosecutor's Office et al
as 4:2013cv01180
Plaintiff:
Larry Elem
Defendant:
Tucson City Prosecutor's Office and Tucson Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Congress v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2013cv01167
Plaintiff:
Henry A Congress
Defendant:
Tucson, City of, Tucson Police Department, Pima, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2013cv01129
Plaintiff:
Juan Romero
Defendant:
Tucson, City of, Tucson Police Department and Ray Mechtel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De La Cruz v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2013cv01115
Plaintiff:
Anna De La Cruz
Defendant:
Tucson, City of, Tucson Police Department, Ray Mechtel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2013cv01092
Plaintiff:
Marcos Torres
Defendant:
Tucson, City of, Tucson Police Department and Unknown Honomichl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McHugh v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2013cv00590
Plaintiff:
Michael McHugh
Defendant:
Pima, County of , Pima County Sheriff's Department , Clarence W Dupnik and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Elem v. Tucson Police Department et al
as 4:2013cv00579
Plaintiff:
Larry A Elem
Defendant:
Tucson Police Department and Tucson City Prosecutor's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elem v. Robertson et al
as 4:2013cv00364
Plaintiff:
Melvin Elem
Defendant:
Alisha Renee Robertson, Unknown Dickson, Unknown Dollar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
